Misuse Of The Amber Alert by the NCMEC and Law Enforcement
This news story is claiming success with the Amber Alert System. They did capture a mother who took her two children away from foster care by using the Amber Alert. But it reveals a much deeper issue about the Amber Alert.
Amber Alert led to arrest of fugitive mother
© 2007 The Associated PressKETCHIKAN, Alaska — A woman accused of fleeing from Texas with her two sons was apprehended in a small southeast Alaska village after crew members on a regional ferry recognized them from photos issued by the Amber Alert system.
Alaska State Troopers in Klawock on Christmas Eve arrested Lelah Jeanne Sullivan, 48, based on a Texas fugitive arrest warrant. She is being held on $100,000 bail.
U.S. marshals were in Ketchikan in mid-December trying to find Sullivan. She was accused of fleeing Texas with her sons age 13 and 16, who had been placed in a Texas foster home.
Sullivan was charged with two counts of interference with child custody, a felony, and obstruction of a court order.
The woman broke the law. I don’t disagreee with that at all. The police should have arrested her. No problem there either.
However, the Amber Alert should not have been used in this case. It was created with specific criteria for it’s use and law enforcement continues to misuse it since it fell under the control of the NCMEC.
According to Wikipedia, “To avoid both false alarms and having alerts ignored as a “wolf cry”, the criteria for issuing an alert are rather strict.”
Each state’s or province’s AMBER alert plan sets its own criteria for activation, meaning that there are differences between alerting agencies as to which incidents are considered to justify the use of the system. However, the U.S. Department of Justice issues the following “guidance”, which most states are said to “adhere closely to”[5]:
law enforcement must confirm that an abduction has taken place
the child must be at risk of serious injury or death
there must be sufficient descriptive information of child, captor, or captor’s vehicle to issue an alert
the child must be 17 years old or younger
Many law enforcement agencies have not used #2 as a criteris, resulting in many parental abductions triggering an Amber Alert where the child is not known or assumed to be at risk of serious injury or death.
In this case, #2 was ignored once again. Many law enforcement agencies misuse the Amber Alert. The result is that the public has become desensitized to it. There are only about 100 stranger abductions in the US each year. If the Amber Alert was reserved for those cases as it was intended to be, people would pay more attention to it and we would have better results in cases where the child is actually at risk of serious injury or death.